Last updated: May 2026
🛒 Where to Buy
- → The Last of Us Part IBest for: experiencing the original game
- → Castlevania Netflix SeriesBest for: gothic horror storytelling
- → Sonic the Hedgehog (2020)Best for: family-friendly gaming adaptation
- → Arcane League of LegendsBest for: character-driven gaming story
- → Cyberpunk 2077 AnimeBest for: stylish sci-fi gaming narrative
RetroInHand may earn a small commission from qualifying Amazon purchases at no extra cost to you.
Why The Last of Us Changed Everything for Gaming Adaptations
I remember sitting in my living room in January 2023, watching the opening episode of HBO’s The Last of Us, and feeling something I hadn’t expected: genuine emotion. Not the cool detachment of a well-made spectacle, but the kind of gut-punch that comes when you see a piece of media you’ve loved treated with actual respect. Pedro Pascal’s weathered face in those first moments wasn’t just casting—it was a statement. This wasn’t going to be a video game adaptation that patronised its source material or swung wildly between fan service and trying too hard to seem “elevated.” It was going to be what most gaming adaptations have never quite managed: something that understood why the game mattered in the first place.
The success of The Last of Us—and I’m talking both critical acclaim and the fact it genuinely resonated with people who’d never touched a controller—wasn’t an accident. Director Craig Mazin and creator Neil Druckmann essentially asked the right question: not “how do we make a TV show out of this game,” but “what is the human story underneath all this?” That’s a fundamentally different approach, and it opened a door. Suddenly, television executives stopped assuming gaming stories were inherently juvenile or too niche. The medium itself gained credibility.
But here’s the thing: The Last of Us wasn’t actually the first gaming adaptation to get this right. It was just the most visible. And if you’re sitting there now, post-Last of Us, hungry for more television that captures that same blend of character-driven narrative, emotional weight, and genuine respect for the source material, there are actually several shows worth your time—some of them going back further than you might think.
Castlevania (Netflix, 2017–2021): The Show That Proved Serialised Gaming Stories Could Work
What It Is and How It Handles the Source Material
Castlevania is, objectively, the bridge between early video game adaptations and The Last of Us. It premiered on Netflix in 2017, when video game shows were still treated as afterthoughts, and it did something genuinely bold: it took the Castlevania franchise—a series that never had a coherent narrative across its games, just vibes and gothic atmosphere—and built an original four-season arc around it.
Creator Warren Ellis made the smart choice of not being slavishly faithful to any single game’s plot. Instead, he mined the aesthetic (gothic horror, vampires, demon hunting) and the core cast (Trevor Belmont, Sypha Belnades, Alucard) from across the franchise’s history, then wrote original stories that honoured why people loved those games in the first place. The source material wasn’t sacred text to adapt frame-for-frame; it was inspiration for something new.
The first season is particularly brilliant. It’s only four episodes—lean, focused, intense—and it does exactly what The Last of Us does: establishes character relationships through conflict and circumstance. Trevor Belmont isn’t a hero in the traditional sense; he’s a drunk, cynical warrior who gets pulled into something bigger than himself. Sypha starts as a religious refugee with unexpected powers. Alucard is isolated and haunted. These are character arcs that matter, built through conversation and moral complexity, not exposition dumps or action sequences.
What Fans Love and What They Hate
Castlevania fans absolutely adore the first two seasons. The character development, the atmospheric direction, the weight given to relationship-building—these elements feel earned. The Belmont Castle flashbacks, the slow-burn tension between the three main characters, the way the show treats its world-building with gravitas. I watched the first season in one sitting because I couldn’t stop, which is precisely what The Last of Us manages to do.
But here’s where it gets complicated: seasons three and four divide audiences sharply. They introduce new characters, sprawl across a larger narrative, and lose some of that intimate focus that made the early episodes sing. The final season particularly becomes something different—less character study, more epic fantasy action. Some viewers see this as appropriate scope expansion; others see it as the show losing its identity. It’s worth knowing this trajectory before you commit to all four seasons.
Cultural Context and Comparison
Castlevania arrived at a specific cultural moment. The 2010s were full of dark fantasy television (Game of Thrones was dominating; The Witcher was in development), and Castlevania proved that animation could carry genuine dramatic weight and mature storytelling. It wasn’t Castlevania that proved video game adaptations could work—it was Castlevania that proved animation could be taken seriously alongside live-action prestige drama.
Compared to The Last of Us, Castlevania is smaller in scope but similarly character-focused in its best moments. Where The Last of Us uses its game heritage as thematic grounding (infection as metaphor for connection and loss), Castlevania uses the gaming legacy as a starting point for pure storytelling freedom. Neither approach is better; they’re just different strategies for respecting source material.
Cyberpunk: Edgerunners (Netflix, 2022): Stylish, Violent, and Deeply Character-Driven
The Anime That Made a Game’s World Matter
Cyberpunk 2077 had a troubled launch in December 2020—a commercial and critical disappointment that overshadowed what was genuinely innovative about its design and storytelling. Two years later, Studio Trigger’s Cyberpunk: Edgerunners arrived on Netflix, and it did something remarkable: it made people who’d never played the game care deeply about that world, and it made people who’d been burned by the game’s launch feel seen and understood.
The show follows Lucy, a street hacker, and David Martinez, a rich kid slumming with the edgerunners (mercenary outlaws) of Night City. It’s a love story dressed up as a cyberpunk action series. It’s also—and this is crucial—structured like a tragedy from episode one. You’re watching two people fall in love in a system designed to crush them, and the show never lets you forget that the ending is already written.
Where The Last of Us is about two people learning to care about each other through circumstance and shared survival, Cyberpunk: Edgerunners is about two people falling in love knowing it can’t possibly end well. The emotional mechanics are different, but the weight is similar. Both shows use their game worlds as settings for intimate human drama rather than venues for spectacle.
Why It Works Despite Using a Controversial Source
This is the clever bit. Cyberpunk 2077 was a disaster on launch, but the underlying world-building—created by Mike Pondsmith and refined by the game’s writers—was actually excellent. Edgerunners bypassed the gameplay disappointments entirely and went straight to the narrative strength. It’s a lesson in how a game’s story can survive its mechanical failures if you have the right platform and creative vision to tell it properly.
Studio Trigger’s animation style is deliberately stylised—bright neon colours, dynamic action, visual storytelling that flows like comic panels. It shouldn’t work for something this emotionally intimate, but it absolutely does. The animation keeps a psychological distance that actually serves the tragedy. You’re watching these characters in this gorgeous, dangerous world, and the artistry makes the inevitable heartbreak feel almost mythic.
The show respects the game’s source material by taking its world seriously whilst completely disregarding the need to adapt specific game quests or mechanics. Your protagonist isn’t V, the player character from the game. Your story doesn’t follow the game’s narrative beats. Instead, Edgerunners exists in the same world, tells its own story, and lets that world’s logic and atmosphere do the heavy lifting.
Arcane (Netflix, 2021–Present): How a League of Legends Adaptation Became Unmissable Television
The Show That Proved Games Themselves Weren’t the Story
Arcane arrived with precisely zero expectations from anyone who wasn’t deeply invested in League of Legends lore. That was actually its greatest strength. Most viewers came to Arcane having never touched the game, and they found a story about two sisters separated by class, revolution, and moral compromise set in a visually stunning fantasy-steampunk world. That’s it. That’s what hooked people—not gaming credentials, but genuine storytelling.
The show’s opening episodes establish twin protagonists (Vi and Powder, who becomes Jinx) as children in the impoverished undercity of Zaun, separated by circumstance and choice, and then spends the rest of its runtime exploring how that separation metastasises into something tragic and irreversible. It’s Shakespearean in its scope—two families, two cities, idealism versus pragmatism, the cost of revolution.
Arcane doesn’t ask you to know League of Legends. It doesn’t require you to understand champion abilities or meta-game strategies. In fact, it barely acknowledges the game at all. It’s a television show that happens to be set in the world of a video game, which is fundamentally different from being a “video game adaptation.” This distinction matters enormously, because it means Arcane had the creative freedom to prioritise drama over fan service.
Visual Storytelling and Design as Character
The animation from Fortiche Productions is extraordinary. I genuinely mean that. The visual language changes between scenes to reflect emotional states—rough pencil sketches for traumatic memories, smooth digital rendering for moments of beauty or clarity, almost impressionistic colour work during moments of emotional chaos. This isn’t just beautiful animation; it’s animation that tells story through technique.
Compare this to The Last of Us’ approach: HBO uses conventional cinematography and real locations to ground the story in recognisable reality. Arcane uses animation style itself as narrative language. Both choices are entirely valid and create very different emotional experiences. The Last of Us wants you to imagine “this could happen to us, in our world.” Arcane wants you to feel the mythic weight of generational conflict through pure artistic expression.
The show’s second act introduces Viktor, a chemtech engineer, and Jayce, a Piltover prodigy, and their stories interweave with the sisters’ in ways that feel inevitable in retrospect but surprising in the moment. By the end of season one, you’re watching four central characters all pursuing contradictory goals that make them simultaneously sympathetic and destructive. This is sophisticated narrative structure—not because it’s complicated, but because it respects your intelligence.
The Witcher (Netflix, 2019–Present): Adapting a Game, a Book Series, and Audience Expectations Simultaneously
The Messier, More Chaotic Approach
The Witcher is worth including in this conversation even though it’s perhaps not as focused as The Last of Us or Arcane, because it represents a different kind of creative challenge: adapting a game that was itself an adaptation of beloved source material. Netflix’s The Witcher had to balance Andrzej Sapkowski’s original Polish novels, CD Projekt Red’s game interpretations, and the existing fanbase’s passionate attachments to all of it.
The result is uneven. Season one is genuinely brilliant—moody, atmospheric, and deeply committed to character psychology over plot momentum. Henry Cavill’s Geralt is gruff and world-weary in exactly the way the character should be, and the show’s willingness to spend entire episodes on character moments rather than plot advancement is refreshing. But season two loses some of that focus, introducing multiple storylines that don’t always cohere, and season three… let’s just say it’s more complicated.
What matters for our purposes is this: The Witcher proves that you can be faithful to a gaming property’s spirit without being slavishly literal. Cavill’s casting, the production design, the tone—these are all interpretations rather than direct transcriptions. Some fans love this; others feel it betrays their vision of the characters. But the show itself prioritises character development and genuine drama over gaming mechanics or Easter eggs, which means it at least sits in the same artistic space as The Last of Us.
Why It’s Worth Watching Despite Its Flaws
The Witcher’s first season contains some of the best character writing in any recent fantasy drama. The episode focusing entirely on Yennefer’s journey from hunchbacked girl to powerful sorceress is particularly brilliant—it’s The Last of Us-adjacent in its focus on showing rather than telling, on letting character change happen through action and consequence rather than exposition. Season one understands that character arcs are more interesting than plot mechanics.
Later seasons struggle with this balance as they try to service more storylines and more characters simultaneously. This is instructive, actually. It suggests that the magic ingredient in successful gaming adaptations isn’t budget or source material quality—it’s creative restraint. The shows that work best (The Last of Us, Arcane, Castlevania’s first season, The Witcher’s first season) all know what story they’re telling and who it’s about. When they lose that focus, they lose the emotional resonance.
Sonic the Hedgehog Films (2020–Present): Why Respecting Fans Can Save a Franchise
The Adaptation That Actually Listened
The Sonic films don’t fit the same mould as The Last of Us—they’re not prestige drama, they’re family entertainment—but they’re worth discussing because they represent a specific kind of respect: the studios actually listened to fan feedback and course-corrected rather than bulldozing through their original vision.
The first Sonic film was initially designed with a redesigned Sonic that looked nothing like the original character. Fans complained loudly. The studio scrapped it, redesigned him to match the source material, and released a version that looked actually correct. This single decision—”we heard you, and we’re going to change the fundamentally expensive visual effects to match your expectations”—sent a message that the filmmakers cared about getting this right.
The resulting films are entertaining in a straightforward way. They’re not trying to be dark or “elevated.” They understand that Sonic is fundamentally about speed, humour, and a sense of fun, so they lean into that. Ben Schwartz’s Sonic is energetic and charming without being annoying. The action sequences are kinetic and actually comprehensible (unlike many modern action films). The films don’t take themselves too seriously, but they take their responsibility to the source material seriously.
A Different Kind of Success
Unlike The Last of Us, which elevated its source material into prestige drama, Sonic the Hedgehog films succeed by understanding what the games fundamentally are—fun, accessible, visually dynamic experiences—and translating that essence into film. This is a legitimate approach to adaptation even if it’s not as artistically ambitious as HBO’s approach to The Last of Us.
The films prove something important: gaming fans aren’t a monolith with one definition of “respect.” Some want their source material elevated and reinterpreted (as The Last of Us does). Some want faithful translation of tone and spirit (as Sonic does). Some want original stories set in familiar worlds (as Edgerunners does). What matters is that creators understand what their source material actually is—what makes it distinctive, what audiences love about it—and then execute that vision with competence and genuine care.
Castlevania: Nocturne (Netflix, 2023–Present): Sequels and Spin-offs Done Right
Following Up Without Repeating
Warren Ellis’ original Castlevania concluded its story, and rather than milk it for spin-offs, the team handed the property to new creators. Castlevania: Nocturne, developed by Clive Bradley, relocates the story to 19th-century Paris and introduces a fresh cast—Richter Belmont, Maria Renard, Annette, and others. It risks being redundant; instead, it’s vital.
Nocturne takes everything the original series learned about adapting Castlevania and applies it to new characters and situations. You’re watching the formation of new relationships, new conflicts, new moral tensions. The gothic atmosphere is maintained, but the story feels genuinely different. This is how you expand a franchise—not by retreading familiar ground, but by proving that the approach works for other stories within the same world.
If you loved The Last of Us and Castlevania, Nocturne is essential viewing because it demonstrates something crucial: strong source material, trusted creative leadership, and clear narrative vision can carry multiple iterations. It’s not the same show with different characters. It’s a different show that shares DNA with its predecessor.
Halo (Paramount+, 2022–Present): The Adaptation That Chose Creative Freedom Over Literal Faithfulness
A Controversial But Interesting Choice
Halo’s Paramount+ series sparked fierce debate within gaming fandom because it made a deliberate choice: rather than adapting the existing game narratives, it created an alternate timeline with an alternate Master Chief. The games continue as their own thing; the show is its own thing. This isn’t what fans wanted, and it caused considerable backlash.
But here’s what’s worth considering: the show itself is competently made and dramatically engaging. It’s not trying to be The Last of Us or Arcane—it’s action-adventure drama with decent character work and genuine stakes. The choice to create an alternate reality allowed the writers to tell stories that might have felt constrained by faithfulness to the games’ canonical events.
Halo represents the risk of creative freedom without the payoff of obvious respect for source material. Fans felt ignored, which meant the show had to work twice as hard to earn engagement. Compared to The Last of Us (which clearly honoured its source even whilst changing details) or Arcane (which created original stories in a game’s world), Halo felt like it was running away from the source rather than engaging with it.
The Lesson Here
Halo’s relative underperformance (compared to expectations) teaches something important: audiences can accept creative reinterpretation, but they need to feel that the creators understand and respect what came before. The Last of Us changed story details, shifted narrative emphasis, and made original scenes—but you never questioned whether Craig Mazin understood why The Last of Us game mattered. With Halo, that question lingered.
Retro Gaming Adaptations Still Worth Discovering
The Forgotten Gems
If you’re working through the shows above and still hungry for more, there are some deeper cuts worth exploring. The Castlevania Netflix series inspired Konami to greenlight Contra: Hard Corps Uprising animated adaptations (still in development at time of writing, but promising). The success of gaming adaptations has opened doors for properties that wouldn’t have been touched five years ago.
Daria, whilst not a gaming adaptation per se, influenced the visual and tonal language that shows like Cyberpunk: Edgerunners use—the stylised animation, the emotional authenticity beneath irreverent surface humour. The Owl House (despite not being gaming-related) demonstrates how animated series can create genuine dramatic stakes and character relationships. Understanding what’s working in adjacent media helps explain why certain gaming adaptations land.
There’s also the question of international adaptations. South Korean animation has been particularly sophisticated in translating gaming narratives (though not always specifically adapting games). The anime approach to gaming worlds has proven more flexible and creatively interesting than some live-action attempts, which is why Cyberpunk: Edgerunners and Arcane—both animated—rank among the most successful gaming adaptations.
What Makes These Adaptations Actually Work
The Pattern Emerges
After watching all of these shows, a clear pattern becomes obvious. Successful gaming adaptations share specific characteristics:
- Respect without literalism. They understand what makes the source material distinctive but don’t feel obligated to recreate game mechanics or plot points exactly.
- Character focus over spectacle. They spend time with relationships, motivations, and internal conflicts rather than assuming gameplay action equals narrative tension.
- Tone clarity. They know whether they’re making tragedy (The Last of Us, Cyberpunk: Edgerunners), adventure (Sonic), fantasy drama (Arcane, The Witcher), or gothic horror (Castlevania), and they commit to that choice.
- Creative leadership with vision. Craig Mazin on The Last of Us, Warren Ellis on Castlevania, Studio Trigger on Edgerunners, Fortiche Productions on Arcane—these are creators with established reputations who brought their own sensibility to the material.
- Willingness to reinterpret. The best adaptations don’t see the game as a script; they see it as inspiration. The story might be different, the protagonist might be different, the ending might be different—but the spirit remains.
The shows that fail tend to lack at least one of these elements. They either feel beholden to gaming source material in ways that constrain drama (Halo), or they lose focus and chase spectacle over character (Castlevania seasons 3 and 4), or they assume being a “prestige” adaptation automatically makes them good without doing the work to earn it.
Where Gaming Adaptations Are Headed
What The Last of Us Opened Up
The Last of Us’ success has already shifted industry thinking. There are multiple other Naughty Dog adaptations in development (Uncharted already had a film; The Last of Us Part II is being discussed). The question is whether those adaptations will understand The Last of Us’ secret: that the game’s strength isn’t its spectacle or its gameplay systems, but the relationship between its two protagonists and how that relationship transforms both of them.
We’re also seeing more gaming IP being approached as source material for original storytelling (like Arcane and Edgerunners do) rather than direct adaptation. This seems like the most promising direction. Games have rich worlds, established visual languages, and complex mythologies—these are perfect jumping-off points for television that tells its own stories rather than trying to recreate gaming experiences for passive viewers.
The risk is that studios assume The Last of Us’ success was about prestige or production budget rather than about creative clarity and respect. There will be failed adaptations that spend enormous amounts of money whilst missing the point entirely. There will be shows that try to be “like The Last of Us” by being dark and serious rather than by actually earning emotional weight through character work.
Your Actual Watch List
If You Loved The Last of Us, Watch These in This Order
Immediate next steps: Start with Arcane season one. It’s only nine episodes, it’s immediately gripping, and it demonstrates how gaming worlds can be translation into premium television drama without sacrificing visual sophistication or character complexity. The animation is gorgeous, the story is emotionally devastating, and it requires zero gaming knowledge.
Then watch Castlevania’s first season (four episodes) and second season (eight episodes). These are the closest spiritual predecessors to The Last of Us—character-driven, atmospheric, deeply concerned with relationships and moral complexity rather than action spectacle. You can stop after season two if you want; season three and four are good but inconsistent.
Follow that with Cyberpunk: Edgerunners (10 episodes). It’s stylistically very different from The Last of Us—the animation is vibrant and stylised where The Last of Us is naturalistic—but the emotional core is similar. You’re watching two people form a connection in a harsh world, knowing the system is designed to destroy them. It hurts in a way that sticks with you.
If you want something lighter and more family-friendly, the Sonic films are entertaining and prove that respect for source material can work in mainstream entertainment. If you want something more ambitious, The Witcher’s first season is rewarding (though quality drops after that).
Skip Halo unless you’re specifically interested in what happens when a gaming adaptation prioritises creative freedom over source respect. It’s not bad exactly, but it’s the closest thing on this list to “wasted potential.”
Total Time Investment
Arcane: 9 episodes × 45 minutes = 6.75 hours
Castlevania seasons 1-2: 12 episodes × 25 minutes = 5 hours
Cyberpunk: Edgerunners: 10 episodes × 25 minutes = 4.16 hours
Sonic films: 2 films × 100 minutes = 3.3 hours
Total: approximately 19 hours of television to get you through the best gaming adaptations currently available.
The Verdict: Why These Shows Matter Beyond Gaming
What strikes me about all of these shows is that the best ones don’t market themselves as “gaming adaptations” in the way earlier attempts did. They’re dramas, fantasies, action series, horror stories—that just happen to originate from gaming IP. The Last of Us worked partly because HBO marketed it as prestige drama with a stellar cast, not as “that video game show.” Arcane works partly because you can watch it knowing nothing about League of Legends and still be completely invested.
This is how gaming adaptations actually succeed. They stop treating gaming as a constraint that needs defending and start treating it as source material equal to literature, comics, or original ideas. A game is a narrative object with its own strengths—worldbuilding, interactive discovery, player agency—that don’t translate directly to television. The best shows understand this and build new narratives that capture the essential experience of the game without trying to recreate gameplay.
The Last of Us succeeded because it understood that its game was ultimately about two people learning to trust each other in a world designed to prevent connection. Everything else—the infection, the fighting, the journey across America—serves that central relationship. The show kept that core and changed everything else as needed.
If you’re going to work through these other shows, that’s the framework to bring: not “is this faithful to the game?” but “does this understand what made the source material matter?” Judge them on whether they create genuine drama, whether you care about the characters, whether the world feels lived-in and real. Those are the standards that matter, and they’re the standards that The Last of Us met so completely.
We’re living in a moment where gaming adaptations have finally broken through into mainstream prestige television. The shows I’ve listed above prove that gaming stories can compete with any other source material for quality and emotional impact. Now the challenge is whether the industry will learn the right lessons from their success—and whether future adaptations will understand that respect means creative freedom, not slavish literalism. The next few years of gaming adaptations will determine whether this moment is a genuine shift or just a cultural moment that passes. Based on what’s in development, I’m cautiously optimistic. But optimism should always be tempered by caution when it comes to adaptation.